Search found 76 matches
- Wed May 24, 2023 5:39 am America/New_York
- Forum: Questions/Comments
- Question: ATMWARN not used in VIIRS PIC l2bin flags
- Replies: 1
ATMWARN not used in VIIRS PIC l2bin flags
Hi, I found in SeaDAS OCSSW sources that in the share/viirs/l2bin_defaults_PIC.par file the flaguse parameter does not contain the ATMWARN flag, is this normal? because it is present for modis and seawifs and also enabled on https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/atbd/ocl2flags/ "L3 Mask Default"...
- Fri Nov 18, 2022 10:36 am America/New_York
- Forum: Questions/Comments
- Question: file_search api seems broken
- Replies: 7
Re: file_search api seems broken
On my side I still get the 404 error.
- Fri Nov 18, 2022 9:09 am America/New_York
- Forum: Questions/Comments
- Question: file_search api seems broken
- Replies: 7
Re: file_search api seems broken
Hi, We observe the same pb, and we suspect that the API now returns an error if none product is found by the search, example: this one fails because VIIRSN was down on this specific day and there is no products: wget --no-check-certificate --post-data="sensor=viirs&sdate=2022-08-01&edat...
- Thu Oct 06, 2022 10:03 am America/New_York
- Forum: Questions/Comments
- Question: MODIS Aqua R2022 granule start time vs R2018
- Replies: 4
Re: MODIS Aqua R2022 granule start time vs R2018
Thanks Tommy this is clear now.
- Thu Oct 06, 2022 8:45 am America/New_York
- Forum: Questions/Comments
- Question: MODIS Aqua R2022 granule start time vs R2018
- Replies: 4
Re: MODIS Aqua R2022 granule start time vs R2018
Hi, Sorry to bother you again about products start time, but I found these cases which seem suspect to me: AQUA_MODIS.20220606T1855 03 .L2.OC.nc which is ~3 seconds after its time_coverage_start = "2022-06-06T18:55: 00 .545Z" and also the corresponding NRT products was AQUA_MODIS.20220606T...
- Fri Sep 30, 2022 5:12 am America/New_York
- Forum: Questions/Comments
- Question: VIIRS/SNPP
- Replies: 6
Re: VIIRS/SNPP
Hi,
For information I found in your archive one suspect file which does not follow the new file naming convention (it ends with *.SNPP_OC.NRT.nc):
https://oceandata.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/ob/getfile/SNPP_VIIRS.20220928T223000.L2.SNPP_OC.NRT.nc
Best,
Julien
For information I found in your archive one suspect file which does not follow the new file naming convention (it ends with *.SNPP_OC.NRT.nc):
https://oceandata.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/ob/getfile/SNPP_VIIRS.20220928T223000.L2.SNPP_OC.NRT.nc
Best,
Julien
- Mon Sep 12, 2022 5:43 am America/New_York
- Forum: Questions/Comments
- Question: Redundant HTTP server?
- Replies: 1
Redundant HTTP server?
Hi, Is there another HTTP backup/redundant server for https://oceandata.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov which could be used in case of server failure or temporary IP blacklisting? Sorry for the question but we are exploring possibilities to improve our robustness in case of issue, so if a redundant server exists ...
- Fri Sep 09, 2022 11:47 am America/New_York
- Forum: Questions/Comments
- Question: MODIS-Aqua archive reprocessed again?
- Replies: 1
MODIS-Aqua archive reprocessed again?
Hi,
It seems that the full MODIS-Aqua archive has just been reprocessed again at the beginning of September?
What are the changes compared to the previous MODIS-Aqua R2022 release?
Thanks,
Julien
It seems that the full MODIS-Aqua archive has just been reprocessed again at the beginning of September?
What are the changes compared to the previous MODIS-Aqua R2022 release?
Thanks,
Julien
- Mon Sep 05, 2022 3:46 am America/New_York
- Forum: Questions/Comments
- Question: File Search broken ?
- Replies: 13
Re: File Search broken ?
Hi, Since 3 weeks we successfully got back to search requests by 30-days periods, but the same problem came back since 01 September 4:00pm UTC, the searchs timeout after 5 minutes and you can see on the log of this morning below that some requests are successful but are very long, more than 3-4 minu...
- Tue Aug 16, 2022 5:31 am America/New_York
- Forum: Questions/Comments
- Question: MODIS Aqua R2022 granule start time vs R2018
- Replies: 4
MODIS Aqua R2022 granule start time vs R2018
Hi, We found that with R2022 the granule start time in the new filenaming convention is not consistent with R2018: with R2018 seconds were always set to 00, but with R2022 there is a mix of 00 and 01, is it normal? Example: R2018: A2003001004500.L2_LAC_OC.nc A2003001005000.L2_LAC_OC.nc A200300100550...