The param you are looking for is:
dem_auxfile (ifile) = auxiliary digital elevation map file
Not sure when elev_auxfile was changed.
don
Search found 277 matches
- Tue Sep 01, 2026 11:36 am America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: Support for benthic PAR in OCSSW v2026.4
- Replies: 2
- Thu Jul 23, 2026 10:00 am America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: seeking for a guidance to build OCSSW viirs l1b tools from source code
- Replies: 2
Re: seeking for a guidance to build OCSSW viirs l1b tools from source code
Due to licensing issues with Raytheon, we can not provide the source code for the VIIRS programs.
Don
Don
- Fri Jul 10, 2026 1:44 pm America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: MODIS l2gen issue with xcal files
- Replies: 2
Re: MODIS l2gen issue with xcal files
l2gen does not support MODIS collection7 yet. We do not have LUTs that calibrate MODIS collection7 correctly. Currently you need to get the L1A file from us or LAADS which must be an HDF4 file. To get the correct calibration use modis_GEO and modis_L1B to get the GEO and L1B files to feed into l2gen...
- Fri Jul 10, 2026 1:22 pm America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: OCSSW l2gen Invalid argument "pic_limits_file"
- Replies: 11
Re: OCSSW l2gen Invalid argument "pic_limits_file"
Lets make sure the correct version of l2gen is installed.
This is what it should be:
dshea@gs616-analysis703:~$ ODPS/odps-test/bin/l2gen --version
msl12 10.2.0-V2026.3 (Jun 18 2026 17:32:07)
don
This is what it should be:
dshea@gs616-analysis703:~$ ODPS/odps-test/bin/l2gen --version
msl12 10.2.0-V2026.3 (Jun 18 2026 17:32:07)
don
- Wed Apr 22, 2026 9:03 am America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: can not Get a copy of the OCSSW source git repository
- Replies: 1
Re: can not Get a copy of the OCSSW source git repository
I believe the "git" protocol requires a configured ssh public key. Try http instead:
git clone https://git.smce.nasa.gov/oel/ocssw.git
don
git clone https://git.smce.nasa.gov/oel/ocssw.git
don
- Thu Mar 26, 2026 10:48 am America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: L2Gen for 500m resolution too slow
- Replies: 2
Re: L2Gen for 500m resolution too slow
What version of OCSSW are you running? You might want to try installing the "--arch=odps" if your linux kernel is new enough to see if that helps. When I run a MODIS granule at resolution=500, I get mostly CPU saturation. If you are not CPU or IO limited and the memory is only about 1.2G, ...
- Mon Mar 23, 2026 1:24 pm America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: OCSSW V2026.0 -- missing instrument_defaults.par for VIIRS
- Replies: 2
Re: OCSSW V2026.0 -- missing instrument_defaults.par for VIIRS
I just tested this. The l2gen executable delivered in V2026.0 does not need the instrument_defaults.par file. Could you be running an older version of l2gen with the V2026.0 version of the share data? This is the version of l2gen in V2026.0 l2gen --version msl12 10.0.0-V2026.0 (Mar 11 2026 20:00:27)...
- Thu Mar 12, 2026 6:20 pm America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: Error in VIIRS l2gen processing, version 9.11.0-V2025.5
- Replies: 3
Re: Error in VIIRS l2gen processing, version 9.11.0-V2025.5
To simplify the inner workings of l2gen for VIIRS we no longer support giving l2gen a VIIRS L1A file as the ifile. The ifile needs to be an L1B. Use "calibrate_viirs" to make an L1B from the L1A. calibrate_viirs ifile=viirs.L1A.nc l1bfile_mod=viirs.L1B.nc l2gen ifile=viirs.L1B.nc ofile=vii...
- Mon Jan 26, 2026 9:15 am America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: l3mapgen is extremely slow when generating 500 m daily mosaic over China region – any optimization suggestions?
- Replies: 1
Re: l3mapgen is extremely slow when generating 500 m daily mosaic over China region – any optimization suggestions?
At 500m you might be running into a cache size problem with l3mapgen writing NetCDF. Try running l3mapgen with "deflate=0". The file will be a lot bigger without compression, but this should speed up processing if the cache is the problem. You can always run h5repack on the file to compres...
- Fri Dec 19, 2025 11:46 am America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: mismatch in ntime
- Replies: 3
Re: mismatch in ntime
MODIST lasted longer than one of the internal tables could handle.
Need to use T20025.16 or later. See:
viewtopic.php?t=7294
don
Need to use T20025.16 or later. See:
viewtopic.php?t=7294
don