Forum

Dear Support, It's first time I see something like this. The OCI granules are always 5-min apart, but these two are odd: PACE_OCI.20250312T183450.L1B.V3.nc PACE_OCI.20250312T183505.L1B.V3.nc Please forward this to the group who can handle it if it's an artifact. This EarthData Search screenshot show...

Thanks,
Yes, the search portal has now been up-to-date

Yuyuan

Dear Support, This is the link for PACE-OCI L1B v3 https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov/search/granules?portal=obdaac&p=C3392966952-OB_CLOUD&pg[0][v]=f&pg[0][gsk]=-start_date&q=pace&tl=1740925793!3!! The data staging was paused on 02/27 midday. I thought it was some delay. But I jus...

OB.DAAC - SeanBailey wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 7:46 am America/New_York Until the file is updated to include the most recent LUTs, yes, the simplest solution is to manually update the instrument_defaults.par file to point at the LUTs in $OCVARROOT/viirsn/cal/OPER

Sean

Thanks, it works.

Dear Support, I installed the latest V2025.1 In $OCSSWROOT/share/viirs/npp/instrument_defaults.par, the current setting: ... rsb_dynamic_lut_file=$OCVARROOT/viirsn/cal/OPER/VIIRS_NPP_CAL_RSB_DYNAMIC_LUT_20111122_20240107_v3.1.0.25_20230901_obpg.nc ... However, that file was not downloaded by install...

Dear Support,

For instance,
https://oceandata.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/directdataaccess/Ancillary/GLOBAL/2024/15-Dec-2024/
20241215120000-CMC-L4_GHRSST-SSTfnd-CMC0.1deg-GLOB-v02.0-fv03.0.nc

Thanks,
Yuyuan

Just found it is also because of compression in data file. We must use deflated netCDF file, then the spectrum view works well and faster. Any compression (even level=1 only) wouldn't work. I'm using the nccopy command to do the deflation, it takes time for big files. It is not a beautiful solution....

We are also working to get some Landsat-8 data. It seems the OLI processor didn't get enough love. You should install an older version of OCSSW. The V2022.2 works for us.
See this old thread viewtopic.php?t=4788#p16904
Good luck!
Yuyuan

Greeting to everyone, As a big user of subscriptions (200+), I prefer the current way, no change. I don't need to manually adjust the backward days (for the start date) every time after a pause of data staging (in the current way, I can see a huge inflow of data right after the restore of data stagi...

Thanks for the prompt responses.
I believe much more were affected. I'm going to wait until it's all fixed.

Yuyuan