Search found 258 matches

by OB SeaDAS - dshea
Wed Apr 19, 2023 9:10 am America/New_York
Forum: Home
Question: dynamic library error after updating to Tag V2023.1 and V2023.2
Replies: 2

Re: dynamic library error after updating to Tag V2023.1 and V2023.2

Yes, looks like a shared lib problem. The demangled name is just "string.find()" _std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::find(char const*, unsigned long, unsigned long) const Could you try installing tag "T2023.9" I have fixed a few share...
by OB SeaDAS - dshea
Fri Mar 17, 2023 6:28 pm America/New_York
Forum: Home
Question: Error in building OCSSW binaries; SeaDAS 8.2.0 Build from Source Code
Replies: 3

Re: Error in building OCSSW binaries; SeaDAS 8.2.0 Build from Source Code

with gcc11 you need some newer updates to the code. I have built opt/src and ocssw_src on ubuntu22.04 by installing tag T2023.5 install_ocssw -t T2023.5 --src cd $OCSSWROOT rm -rf build mkdir build cd build cmake .. make -j 20 install Your other option would be to install gcc-9, g++-9 and gfortran-9...
by OB SeaDAS - dshea
Fri Mar 03, 2023 8:45 am America/New_York
Forum: Home
Question: Install OCSSW SeaDAS 8.3 Mac OS
Replies: 8

Re: Install OCSSW SeaDAS 8.3 Mac OS

Send me the output from the menu item:
SeaDAS-Toolbox->Software & System Info...

don
by OB SeaDAS - dshea
Wed Jan 04, 2023 9:17 am America/New_York
Forum: Home
Question: tag=R2022.19 OCSSW SMI longitude_step differs from latitude step
Replies: 2

Re: tag=R2022.19 OCSSW SMI longitude_step differs from latitude step

Thanks George, I'll look into it. I will also fix the benchmark scripts to deal with the new naming convention.

don
by OB SeaDAS - dshea
Thu Dec 01, 2022 4:11 pm America/New_York
Forum: Home
Question: What's changes between ocssw V2022.1 and V2022.2?
Replies: 3

Re: What's changes between ocssw V2022.1 and V2022.2?

There was also a change made to process VIIRS J2 files properly:

- fixed tel_start_enc_nominal for VIIRS J2
- fixed missing sgli areosol default LUT

don
by OB SeaDAS - dshea
Tue Nov 29, 2022 10:59 am America/New_York
Forum: Home
Question: Chlorophyll product FLAGS
Replies: 1

Re: Chlorophyll product FLAGS

Every Level 2 NetCDF file has a set of flags in the variable l2_flags. Here is a dump of the definition: int l2_flags(number_of_lines, pixels_per_line) ; l2_flags:long_name = "Level-2 Processing Flags" ; l2_flags:valid_min = -2147483648 ; l2_flags:valid_max = 2147483647 ; l2_flags:flag_mas...
by OB SeaDAS - dshea
Mon Nov 21, 2022 10:30 am America/New_York
Forum: Home
Question: Is there any algorithm description for SeaDAS OCSSW?
Replies: 6

Re: Is there any algorithm description for SeaDAS OCSSW?

Our git repositories are not accessible to the public. You can use SeaDAS to install a released version of the source code. Use the SeaDAS GUI to install the OCSSW src. The code is also available on the web if you want to browse: https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ocssw then click on: Files->web-...
by OB SeaDAS - dshea
Thu Oct 27, 2022 9:57 am America/New_York
Forum: Home
Question: Where is the Variables of time in the LV3 Chlorophyll data from MODIS-aqua?
Replies: 3

Re: Where is the Variables of time in the LV3 Chlorophyll data from MODIS-aqua?

Monthly data has the days averaged. If you want every day then grab the daily files.

don
by OB SeaDAS - dshea
Mon Oct 24, 2022 10:25 am America/New_York
Forum: Home
Question: How to reproject MODIS L2 data via Python?
Replies: 2

Re: How to reproject MODIS L2 data via Python?

You have found the MODIS Bowtie effect. Since the MODIS sensor has 10 detectors that take data on each scan, the position of the edge pixels at the beginning and end of the scan overlap the previous and next scan. Here is a web page describing this in more detail: https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/do...
by OB SeaDAS - dshea
Thu Oct 20, 2022 3:31 pm America/New_York
Forum: Home
Question: ATMFAIL on northernmost 3 lines in OLCI granules
Replies: 3

Re: ATMFAIL on northernmost 3 lines in OLCI granules

I found the problem with the SAFE file format reader. This will be fixed in the next T and R tags. A value needed by the smile correction was not calculated soon enough. Thanks for finding this.

don