SeaWiFS STRAYLIGHT GAC vs MLAC

Please enter here to ask a question about any NASA Science related topics!
Post Reply
dem1
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:49 am America/New_York

SeaWiFS STRAYLIGHT GAC vs MLAC

by dem1 » Fri Aug 30, 2019 4:23 am America/New_York

Hi,

Is it normal that the STRAYLIGHT flag for SeaWiFS is not consistent between GAC and MLAC products?
For GAC it seems it is a simple fixed kernel around CLDICE but for MLAC it seems not the same algorithm.
When removing CLDICE and STRAYLIGHT pixels, are MLAC products more contaminated by bad cloud border pixels than GAC products?

Thanks in advance,
Julien

Tags:

OB.DAAC - SeanBailey
User Services
User Services
Posts: 1199
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:15 pm America/New_York
Answers: 1

SeaWiFS STRAYLIGHT GAC vs MLAC

by OB.DAAC - SeanBailey » Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:58 am America/New_York

Yes, it is normal.  For the full resolution data (MLAC), the code employs a correction for straylight based on pre-launch measurements.  The GAC data were subsampled on-board the spacecraft and insufficient information is available to apply this correction, so a simplified masking is used.

Sean

dem1
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:49 am America/New_York

SeaWiFS STRAYLIGHT GAC vs MLAC

by dem1 » Fri Aug 30, 2019 8:35 am America/New_York

Thanks Sean.

If I'm not wrong other LAC sensors (MODIS/VIIRS) use simplified masking too?
We observe that SeaWiFS MLAC are more contaminated by cloud borders than GAC and other LAC sensors, do you confirm this? So we are thinking to enlarge CLDICE+STRAYLIGHT for MLAC in our Level-3 processor. Do you know another way to remove contaminated cloud borders?

Thanks in advance,
Julien


OB.DAAC - SeanBailey
User Services
User Services
Posts: 1199
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:15 pm America/New_York
Answers: 1

SeaWiFS STRAYLIGHT GAC vs MLAC

by OB.DAAC - SeanBailey » Fri Aug 30, 2019 10:08 am America/New_York

Yes, the only sensor for which we have a straylight correction is SeaWiFS.  All others use a simple mask based on bright target adjacency.
If you find contamination not captured by the default masking, yes you could increase the straylight mask. 

Sean

Post Reply