Data level distinction?
Data level distinction?
Hi!
I'm having some trouble grasping the distinction between data levels and actual physical interpretation of data.
Say we are talking about chlorophyll concentration: level 1 would include both radiance L (power of the light radiation at specific wavelength per unit solid angle per unit area) and reflectance R (ratio of specific radiance/iradiance, no need to get specific), while level 2 would be chlorophyll concentration for a given swath obtained by applying the algorithms (contained within l2gen) to the appropriate level 1 data.
Am I understanding this correctly?
Thanks!
I'm having some trouble grasping the distinction between data levels and actual physical interpretation of data.
Say we are talking about chlorophyll concentration: level 1 would include both radiance L (power of the light radiation at specific wavelength per unit solid angle per unit area) and reflectance R (ratio of specific radiance/iradiance, no need to get specific), while level 2 would be chlorophyll concentration for a given swath obtained by applying the algorithms (contained within l2gen) to the appropriate level 1 data.
Am I understanding this correctly?
Thanks!
Filters:
-
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2020 5:24 pm America/New_York
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: Data level distinction?
Hi, Please take a look at our product descriptions page:
https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/products/
https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/products/
Re: Data level distinction?
Hi!
Thanks for the reply. I'm aware of the documentatiton, but the term "geophysical" is still too vague to me and doesn't really help me place radiance and/or reflectance into level 1 or 2...
Thanks for the reply. I'm aware of the documentatiton, but the term "geophysical" is still too vague to me and doesn't really help me place radiance and/or reflectance into level 1 or 2...
-
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2020 5:24 pm America/New_York
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: Data level distinction?
The algorithm descriptions are meant to provide extra detail and they have links to papers at the end of each. Are they helpful? Your question feels familiar.There might have been a past question on the forum from a previous user. If I find it, I will post the link here.
If the algorithm doesn't help, would you like to be referred to other resources? Is there something we can do to improve the existing documentation for you?
If the algorithm doesn't help, would you like to be referred to other resources? Is there something we can do to improve the existing documentation for you?
Re: Data level distinction?
Combining the two sources it is implicitly implied that L is the only level 1 physical variable, everything else is level 2. Thanks!
As for suggestions, I reckon some tacit examples of data levels in the documentation would be of great use.
Thank you once again!
As for suggestions, I reckon some tacit examples of data levels in the documentation would be of great use.
Thank you once again!
