Welcome to the Earthdata Forum! Here, the scientific user community and subject matter experts from NASA Distributed Active Archive Centers (DAACs), and other contributors, discuss research needs, data, and data applications.
by earthengine_urs » Wed Jun 03, 2026 10:01 am America/New_York
We recently noticed slight differences between the value of the "time_start" field of a granule and the acquisition time encoded in the filenames for OPERA. For example:
The filename's 2024-10-15T23:59:52Z disagrees with the CMR record's 2024-10-16T00:00:07Z, which we only noticed because it crossed a day boundary and broke some assumptions that we made about the relationship between the two fields. We've since built a workaround but were wondering if this is expected, or if we've misunderstood any subtle difference between the time_start and acquisition time.