SeaDAS inconsistency
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 12:16 pm America/New_York
SeaDAS inconsistency
Hi,
I'm using SeaDAS to analyze seawater turbidity data (using kd490), and I tried to open 2020 and 2021 data recently but it didn't work, basically nothing happens, the files just don't open. In addition, some specific points or "pins" fall on land or on water in different months, even when I use the same coordinates to the same points (I tested the same coordinates on Google Earth, and the coordinates are correct and fall on water).
Thank you,
Giovana
I'm using SeaDAS to analyze seawater turbidity data (using kd490), and I tried to open 2020 and 2021 data recently but it didn't work, basically nothing happens, the files just don't open. In addition, some specific points or "pins" fall on land or on water in different months, even when I use the same coordinates to the same points (I tested the same coordinates on Google Earth, and the coordinates are correct and fall on water).
Thank you,
Giovana
Filters:
-
- Subject Matter Expert
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2021 5:42 pm America/New_York
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: SeaDAS inconsistency
It might be helpful if you let us know what files you have trouble to open. Are they MODIS or VIIRS files? L2, L3b or L3m?
SeaDAS 8.0.0 is a beta version, we do have some known issues and the fix will be in the next release.
In the meantime, you can try SeaDAS-7.5.3: https://oceandata.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/Sea ... ler/7.5.3/.
Here are two posts on reading L3b and L3m files for your reference:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2310&sid=f275b9902d ... 724f0e95b5
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2223&p=7860&sid=f27 ... 95b5#p7860
SeaDAS 8.0.0 is a beta version, we do have some known issues and the fix will be in the next release.
In the meantime, you can try SeaDAS-7.5.3: https://oceandata.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/Sea ... ler/7.5.3/.
Here are two posts on reading L3b and L3m files for your reference:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2310&sid=f275b9902d ... 724f0e95b5
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2223&p=7860&sid=f27 ... 95b5#p7860
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 12:16 pm America/New_York
Re: SeaDAS inconsistency
They are MODIS-Aqua....And all files from the years 2020 and 2021 I have trouble to open.
-
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:15 pm America/New_York
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: SeaDAS inconsistency
As to the apparent navigation issue, I suspect what you are seeing is missing data not that the pixel is on land in some L3 files. The L3 grid is consistent, even at monthly scales, it is quite possible for bins (and subsequently mapped pixels) to not be filled.
Sean
Sean
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 12:16 pm America/New_York
Re: SeaDAS inconsistency
About the data I’m using, they’re actually falling on land, because the coordinates are reliable, and are the same for all the months that I'm analysing. Unfortunately there's no way to attach the images around here, as it would help to better clarify what is happening.
Giovana
Giovana
-
- Subject Matter Expert
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2021 5:42 pm America/New_York
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: SeaDAS inconsistency
You can attach the image here by click "Attachments" tab and "Add files" while you edit your post.
I can open L2 file A2020283185000.L2_LAC_OC.nc
but not A20202752020305.L3m_MO_KD490_Kd_490_4km.nc due to null global attribute value, which is a known issue.
I can open L2 file A2020283185000.L2_LAC_OC.nc
but not A20202752020305.L3m_MO_KD490_Kd_490_4km.nc due to null global attribute value, which is a known issue.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 12:16 pm America/New_York
Re: SeaDAS inconsistency
I'm sorry, I hadn't seen the option to attach files before. But here are the images that I mentioned.
If you examine attached figure 1 (Modis-aqua monthly data for Feb/2019, using 4 km resolution), you will notice that those two coordinates fall on land. For the next month (Mar/2019, see figure 2), the very same coordinates fall on water. Using Google Earth, both coordinated fall on water (as it is expected, figure 3).
If you examine attached figure 1 (Modis-aqua monthly data for Feb/2019, using 4 km resolution), you will notice that those two coordinates fall on land. For the next month (Mar/2019, see figure 2), the very same coordinates fall on water. Using Google Earth, both coordinated fall on water (as it is expected, figure 3).
- Attachments
-
- Figure 1
- 1.jpeg (90.63 KiB) Not viewed yet
-
- Figure 2
- 2.jpeg (93.65 KiB) Not viewed yet
-
- Figure 3
- 3.jpg (144.08 KiB) Not viewed yet
Last edited by giovana.damiati on Thu May 13, 2021 12:03 pm America/New_York, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 12:16 pm America/New_York
Re: SeaDAS inconsistency
To xuanyang02,
I'm not aware of this problem, could you explain it to me? Is it related to version 8.0 of SeaDAS? And how could we solve this? because it’s exactly the type of file I’m using (L3m).
I'm not aware of this problem, could you explain it to me? Is it related to version 8.0 of SeaDAS? And how could we solve this? because it’s exactly the type of file I’m using (L3m).
-
- Subject Matter Expert
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2021 5:42 pm America/New_York
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: SeaDAS inconsistency
If you do "ncdump -h A20202752020305.L3m_MO_KD490_Kd_490_4km.nc", you will find there are a few global attributes with null value. For example, "ofile", "width" and etc in "input_parameters" group. There is a bug in SeaDAS 8.0.0 that reading such a file will fail. The fix is in the next release. In the meantime, you can try SeaDAS-7.5.3 to read L3m files. You can download it from https://oceandata.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/Sea ... ler/7.5.3/
Thanks for sharing the above images. In figure 1, we just have missing data at the two pixels you pinned. It does not mean these two pixels are on land.
Bing
Thanks for sharing the above images. In figure 1, we just have missing data at the two pixels you pinned. It does not mean these two pixels are on land.
Bing
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 12:16 pm America/New_York