MODIS Aqua R2022 granule start time vs R2018

Use this Forum to find information on, or ask a question about, NASA Earth Science data.
Post Reply
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:49 am America/New_York

MODIS Aqua R2022 granule start time vs R2018

by dem1 » Tue Aug 16, 2022 5:31 am America/New_York


We found that with R2022 the granule start time in the new filenaming convention is not consistent with R2018: with R2018 seconds were always set to 00, but with R2022 there is a mix of 00 and 01, is it normal?
We also found files with seconds different than 00 or 01 and minutes not multiple of 5 with R2022 where they were multiple of 5 and seconds to 00 with R2018, example (files found using the File Search API): <== this one seems to be with R2018
... <== this one (at least) seems not available in the L2 browser


OB.DAAC - SeanBailey
User Services
User Services
Posts: 1315
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:15 pm America/New_York
Answers: 1
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: MODIS Aqua R2022 granule start time vs R2018

by OB.DAAC - SeanBailey » Tue Aug 16, 2022 8:07 am America/New_York


Yes, this is normal (and has been the case for SST L2s since 2019). We decided to stop lying to you :D
The start time in the L2 files is derived from the first valid scan line in the scene. Quite often that is indeed on the 5 minute boundary of the arbitrary chunking that is done to the MODIS data, however, the MODIS scan rate isn't an exact multiple of seconds, so sometimes the time bleeds into the next second. Other times, for one reason or another, the sensor doesn't have any valid data for a fair bit of time into the 5 minute chunk, so the L2 filename time will have a value that isn't so close to the 5 minute boundary as the L1 filename time would have you believe it was.

As for the one you noted appears missing from the L1/2 browser, it's there...but it's a significantly smaller file than the 5 minute variety and only the northern portion of the scene has valid data:


Post Reply