Sudden reduction in available GEDI granules across L2A/L2B/L4A/L4C
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2025 8:10 am America/New_York
Hi Earthdata team,
I’m noticing something unusual in the GEDI archive over the past few days and wanted to check whether any maintenance or restructuring is underway.
In my workflow, I intersect the granule IDs across GEDI L2A, L2B, L4A, and L4C to ensure each granule has the full set of products before downloading. Until recently, the intersection consistently returned around ~89k granules:
2025-11-20 19:02:30 - INFO - Intersection has 89,579 granule IDs across 4 products. Estimated download: ~204.7 TB
Since yesterday, the same query now returns roughly half that number:
2025-12-01 13:49:38 - INFO - Intersection has 46,913 granule IDs across 4 products. Estimated download: ~107 TB
Many granules that were previously accessible (via CMR search and direct download) no longer appear in CMR results for any of the four products.
Is there any ongoing maintenance, temporary removal, or reindexing of the GEDI collections that might explain this?
Thanks a lot for any clarification!
Cheers,
Simon
I’m noticing something unusual in the GEDI archive over the past few days and wanted to check whether any maintenance or restructuring is underway.
In my workflow, I intersect the granule IDs across GEDI L2A, L2B, L4A, and L4C to ensure each granule has the full set of products before downloading. Until recently, the intersection consistently returned around ~89k granules:
2025-11-20 19:02:30 - INFO - Intersection has 89,579 granule IDs across 4 products. Estimated download: ~204.7 TB
Since yesterday, the same query now returns roughly half that number:
2025-12-01 13:49:38 - INFO - Intersection has 46,913 granule IDs across 4 products. Estimated download: ~107 TB
Many granules that were previously accessible (via CMR search and direct download) no longer appear in CMR results for any of the four products.
Is there any ongoing maintenance, temporary removal, or reindexing of the GEDI collections that might explain this?
Thanks a lot for any clarification!
Cheers,
Simon