Page 1 of 1
VIIRS NOAA-21 CLDICE vs NOAA-20
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2026 12:16 pm America/New_York
by dem1
Hi,
It seems that CLDICE is not raised the same way for VIIRS NOAA-21 than for NOAA-20: with NOAA-21 strong clouds are not flag CLDICE, and also CLDICE seems not well flag in glint areas. On the other hand, the ATMFAIL flag is more raised with NOAA-21.
In our GlobColour project we calculate a Cloud Fraction (%) product based on CLDICE, and for NOAA-20 we obtain for example for 2026-02-23:
where for NOAA-21 we obtain:
Is it expected? If yes is it documented somewhere? I searched in reprocessing docs but found nothing.
Do you know if we can implement a workaround for NOAA-21 to have a CLDICE similar to NOAA-20?
Thanks for your help,
Julien
Re: VIIRS NOAA-21 CLDICE vs NOAA-20
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2026 4:35 am America/New_York
by dem1
Up
Re: VIIRS NOAA-21 CLDICE vs NOAA-20
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2026 4:28 am America/New_York
by dem1
Up
Re: VIIRS NOAA-21 CLDICE vs NOAA-20
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2026 11:09 am America/New_York
by OB ScienceSW - jlindo1
Hi Julien,
Would you mind posting the filenames used to generate those images?
Best,
Jakob
Re: VIIRS NOAA-21 CLDICE vs NOAA-20
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2026 12:09 pm America/New_York
by dem1
Hi Jakob,
Sorry for the late reply.
I check the date and sorry I did a mistake, in fact it's 2026-02-23 (I just fixed my post).
For example you can compare these 2 granules:
JPSS1_VIIRS.20260223T085401.L2.OC.NRT.nc
JPSS2_VIIRS.20260223T094801.L2.OC.NRT.nc
Analysis with SNAP: left NOAA-20 with coherent CLDICE, right NOAA-21 where strong clouds are not flagged CLDICE but seem instead flagged ATMFAIL:
Re: VIIRS NOAA-21 CLDICE vs NOAA-20
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2026 10:17 am America/New_York
by OB ScienceSW - jlindo1
Thank you for that. I am looking through the source code and will get back to you when I have something of substance.
Best,
Jakob
Re: VIIRS NOAA-21 CLDICE vs NOAA-20
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2026 3:21 pm America/New_York
by OB ScienceSW - jlindo1
Thank you for your patience with this.
I've been stepping through a debugger and found that the L1 mask is different between the examples you showed. When converting the L1 data to L2, there is a guard against atmospheric correction if the L1 record is masked already. In the JPSS1 data in the region you circled, atmospheric correction seems to be skipped because of this guard. In the region circled for the JPSS2 file, l2gen goes ahead with atmospheric correction at those pixels. It seems as though those pixels flagged ATMFAIL have radiance values that are not physical, so atmospheric correction fails.
Does that answer your question?
Best,
Jakob
Re: VIIRS NOAA-21 CLDICE vs NOAA-20
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2026 9:33 am America/New_York
by OB ScienceSW - jlindo1
Hello,
I dug deeper into this issue and found a problem with one of the LUTs used in VIIRS calibration. We're working on a fix.
Best,
Jakob
Re: VIIRS NOAA-21 CLDICE vs NOAA-20
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 11:58 am America/New_York
by dem1
Hello,
Thanks a lot Jakob for the analysis.
Does this bug impact only CLDICE? or also other data like Rrs because of issue in calibration?
Are VIIRS NOAA-20 and SNPP also impacted by this issue in VIIRS calibration LUT?
Best,
Julien