Search found 64 matches
- Tue Dec 09, 2025 4:37 pm America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: MODIS reprocessing plan
- Replies: 1
Re: MODIS reprocessing plan
The next planned reprocessing for MODIS Aqua ocean color data will not take place until the mission has reached its end. NASA budgets and priorities are still not finalized, so I cannot provide a reliable estimate as to when that reprocessing will be accomplished. That said, I can say that changes i...
- Tue Dec 09, 2025 4:28 pm America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: Questions regarding l2_flag OPSHAL
- Replies: 1
Re: Questions regarding l2_flag OPSHAL
The optically shallow flag (OPSHAL) is actively being populated in the current version of the code. Here is what is output in the current L2 files: int l2_flags(number_of_lines, pixels_per_line) ; l2_flags:long_name = "Level-2 Processing Flags" ; l2_flags:coordinates = "longitude lati...
- Tue Dec 09, 2025 4:24 pm America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: MODIST Status
- Replies: 4
Re: MODIST Status
Andrew, I can't speak to issues with LANCE, but there shouldn't be an issue accessing MODIS Terra L1A data from the OB.DAAC. Can you provide the endpoint you're having issue with? BTW, plans are in flux about the decommissioning of the Terra, Aqua and Aura missions. So far, data are still being coll...
- Tue Sep 23, 2025 9:48 am America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: MODIS Average quality level
- Replies: 7
Re: MODIS Average quality level
It has nothing to do with the "latband" coefficients. There is an explicitly defined geographic box where that test is applied: const float equatorialNorth = 30.0; // the ranges where SST diff tests are applied const float equatorialSouth = -10.0; const float equatorialWest = -105.0; const...
- Mon Sep 22, 2025 3:19 pm America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: How to Correct Scan-Line Striping in SeaDAS Chlorophyll-a Product from Sentinel-2?
- Replies: 1
Re: How to Correct Scan-Line Striping in SeaDAS Chlorophyll-a Product from Sentinel-2?
l2gen has a filtering feature (defined by filter_opt and filter_file). There is a default filter file for MSI, but I don't think it is enabled by default (i.e. filter_opt=0 is set). You can try enabling it to see if that improves the result (filter_opt=1). You can also try modifying the filter_file ...
- Mon Sep 22, 2025 3:07 pm America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: Rayleigh-corrected reflectance (Rrc(λ))
- Replies: 2
Re: Rayleigh-corrected reflectance (Rrc(λ))
To add to Minwei's response... rhos also accounts for gaseous absorption (in addition to simple Rayleigh scattering). It does not require "atmospheric correction" (really, aerosol correction...we're bad at being clear about what the parameters do), so you can set atmocor=0 to speed up the ...
- Mon Sep 22, 2025 8:43 am America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: MODIS Average quality level
- Replies: 7
Re: MODIS Average quality level
This is most definitely an artifact of the cloud screening algorithm. There is an explicit test applied to the region you identified. That test sets the quality flag to a minimum of 2 (and sets the SSTREFDIFF bit in the flags_sst for that pixel) if the computed SST value is significantly less than t...
- Fri Sep 12, 2025 10:25 am America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: SeaDAS new l2gen very slow
- Replies: 17
Re: SeaDAS new l2gen very slow
Yes, a test tag with this fix is being prepped and should be available sometime next week. It will take a little longer to get into a release tag, but as SeaDAS is planning another release in October, it shouldn't be too long of a wait
Regards,
Sean
Regards,
Sean
- Thu Sep 11, 2025 10:05 am America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: SeaDAS new l2gen very slow
- Replies: 17
Re: SeaDAS new l2gen very slow
Roger,
Yep, that was discovered recently by Alex as well and will be corrected in an upcoming release. The wee bit o'code whoopsie that caused the woe was introduced in August 2024 (in the source code),which jives with Fred's report that the slowness began with V2025.1.
Regards,
Sean
Yep, that was discovered recently by Alex as well and will be corrected in an upcoming release. The wee bit o'code whoopsie that caused the woe was introduced in August 2024 (in the source code),which jives with Fred's report that the slowness began with V2025.1.
Regards,
Sean
- Thu Sep 11, 2025 9:39 am America/New_York
- Forum: Home
- Question: Trouble accessing OPeNDAP to download PACE data
- Replies: 4
Re: Trouble accessing OPeNDAP to download PACE data
Yes, this was a temporary issue. The service has been restored.
Regards,
Sean
Regards,
Sean